3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Will Deacon <[email protected]> commit 18d457661fb9fa69352822ab98d39331c3d0e571 upstream. is_valid_cache returns true if the specified cache is valid. Unfortunately, if the parameter passed it out of range, we return -ENOENT, which ends up as true leading to potential hilarity. This patch returns false on the failure path instead. Cc: Christoffer Dall <[email protected]> Cc: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c | 2 +- arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c @@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ static bool is_valid_cache(u32 val) u32 level, ctype; if (val >= CSSELR_MAX) - return -ENOENT; + return false; /* Bottom bit is Instruction or Data bit. Next 3 bits are level. */ level = (val >> 1); --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c @@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ static bool is_valid_cache(u32 val) u32 level, ctype; if (val >= CSSELR_MAX) - return -ENOENT; + return false; /* Bottom bit is Instruction or Data bit. Next 3 bits are level. */ level = (val >> 1); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
