2015-06-24 12:18 keltezéssel, Ingo Molnar írta: > * Jiang Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> A regression report from Boszormenyi Zoltan <[email protected]>: >> There's a Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 (PCI ID 10ec:8168, Subsystem ID >> 1565:230e) >> network chip on the mainboard. After the r8169 driver loaded, the IRQs in >> the machine went berserk. Keyboard keypressed arrived with considerable >> latency and duplicated, so no real work was possible. The machine responded >> to the power button but didn't actually power down. It just stuck at the >> powering down message. I had to press the power button for 4 seconds to power >> it down. >> >> The computer is a POS machine with a big battery inside. Because of this, >> either ACPI or the Realtek chip kept the bad state and after rebooting, the >> network chip didn't even show up in lspci. Not even the PXE ROM announced >> itself during boot. I had to disconnect the battery to beat some sense back >> to the computer. >> >> The regression happens with 4.0.5, 4.1.0-rc8 and 4.1.0-final. 3.18.16 was >> good. > So please put this into quotes, like: > > =============== > Zoltan Boszormenyi reported this regression: > > "There's a Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 (PCI ID 10ec:8168, Subsystem ID > 1565:230e) > network chip on the mainboard. After the r8169 driver loaded, the IRQs in > the machine went berserk. Keyboard keypressed arrived with considerable > latency and duplicated, so no real work was possible. The machine responded > to the power button but didn't actually power down. It just stuck at the > powering down message. I had to press the power button for 4 seconds to > power > it down. > > The computer is a POS machine with a big battery inside. Because of this, > either ACPI or the Realtek chip kept the bad state and after rebooting, the > network chip didn't even show up in lspci. Not even the PXE ROM announced > itself during boot. I had to disconnect the battery to beat some sense back > to the computer. > > The regression happens with 4.0.5, 4.1.0-rc8 and 4.1.0-final. 3.18.16 was > good." > > ... > =============== > > Also note the indentation, that helps readability. > > Thanks, > > Ingo
So, will there be a v4 with a commit message satisfactory to Ingo that will be part of 4.0.7/4.1.1 and 4.2? Best regards, Zoltán -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
