It seems most in-kernel uses are 'array' rather than '&array[0]'
Most of the time, using array is simpler to read than &array[0].
Exceptions exists when addresses for consecutive members are
used like func(&array[0], &array[1]);
Should this preference be put into checkpatch and/or CodingStyle?
Here's a possible checkpatch --strict addition
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 90e1edc..362a9d8 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -5492,6 +5492,12 @@ sub process {
}
}
+# check for address of array[0] (not '&& array[0]' or &array[0].member)
+ if ($sline =~
/[^\&]&\s*($Ident\s*(?:(?:\-\>|\.)\s*$Ident\s*)*)\s*\[\s*0\s*\]\s*(?!\[|\.|\-\>)/)
{
+ CHK("ADDRESSOF_ARRAY",
+ "Using addressof array '$1' index [0] may be
simpler as '$1'\n" . $herecurr);
+ }
+
# check for semaphores initialized locked
if ($line =~ /^.\s*sema_init.+,\W?0\W?\)/) {
WARN("CONSIDER_COMPLETION",
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
