On Fri 22-05-15 17:13:58, Tejun Heo wrote:
> If the completion of a wb_writeback_work can be waited upon by setting
> its ->done to a struct completion and waiting on it; however, for
> cgroup writeback support, it's necessary to issue multiple work items
> to multiple bdi_writebacks and wait for the completion of all.
> 
> This patch implements wb_completion which can wait for multiple work
> items and replaces the struct completion with it.  It can be defined
> using DEFINE_WB_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(), used for multiple work items and
> waited for by wb_wait_for_completion().
> 
> Nobody currently issues multiple work items and this patch doesn't
> introduce any behavior changes.

One more thing...

> @@ -161,17 +178,34 @@ static void wb_queue_work(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
>       trace_writeback_queue(wb->bdi, work);
>  
>       spin_lock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
> -     if (!test_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state)) {
> -             if (work->done)
> -                     complete(work->done);
> +     if (!test_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state))
>               goto out_unlock;

This seems like a change in behavior. Previously unregistered wbs just
completed the work->done, now you don't complete them. Is that intentional?

                                                                Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to