Hi Mark Can I have some feedback about these patches ?
> Current _regmap_update_bits() writes data to register if current value and > write value was different. This means it doesn't write data if the value was > same as current value. > But, some device needs to write data even though it was same value. > > This RFC patch-set adds new "force_write" option on _regmap_update_bits() > for this issue, but it focuses only 1 regmap write function at this point, > because there are many regmap_xxx_write_yyy() functions. > I can care all of regmap_xxx_write_yyy() functions in formal patch-set if > this RFC patch idea was OK. > > What do you think about this idea ? > > Kuninori Morimoto (4): > regmap: add force_write option on _regmap_update_bits() > regmap: add regmap_write_bits() > regmap: add regmap_fields_force_write() > ASoC: rsnd: gen: add rsnd_force_write() > > drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c | 51 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > include/linux/regmap.h | 11 +++++++++++ > sound/soc/sh/rcar/gen.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > sound/soc/sh/rcar/rsnd.h | 4 ++++ > 4 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > Best regards > --- > Kuninori Morimoto -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
