Hello Bartlomiej,

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Exynos5250 based platforms have switched over to use generic
> cpufreq driver for cpufreq functionality. So the Exynos
> specific cpufreq support for these platforms can be removed.
>
> Based on the earlier work by Thomas Abraham.
>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]>
> Cc: Thomas Abraham <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm          |  11 --
>  drivers/cpufreq/Makefile             |   1 -
>  drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c     |   3 -
>  drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.h     |  17 ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/exynos5250-cpufreq.c | 210 
> -----------------------------------
>  5 files changed, 242 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/exynos5250-cpufreq.c
>

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]>

I also tested and on an Exynos5250 Snow Chromebook with
exynos_defconfig + CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT + CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_*, using
different governors and see that the cpu0 and cpu1 frequencies are
scaled and that the total number of CPU frequency transitions in
total_trans are incremented.

Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]>

Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to