On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:16:34AM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
> Just a question that popped to my mind after discussing with a colleague
> - Is GFP_NOFS enough here or should it be GFP_NOIO? Presumably the
> latter is a stronger guarantee that we are not going to hit any
> fs/writeback related code?
GFP_NOFS is fine here; file system code calls the I/O codepaths, but
device driver code doesn't call fs code. Put another way, if there
are pages that are backed by a block device, which can be cleaned
without going through the FS code paths, it's fine to let that happen
while we are inside file system code.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
