On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 02:56:40PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > [ this time with a better subject ] > > > > "extern inline" doesn't make sense. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Isn't 'extern inline' an old gcc trick to force inlining? (instead of > just hinting)
For gcc >= 3.1, we are already telling the compiler that it should either inline the code or abort compilation. "extern inline" doesn't make much sense. And it gives a warning with -Wmissing-prototypes. I'm currently cleaning up warnings with -Wmissing-prototypes to get them to an acceptable level. -Wmissing-prototypes will help us to enforce a coding style that will avoid a class of nasty runtime errors that are currently sometimes hitting us. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/