On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcg...@suse.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 01:25:25PM +0000, Dalessandro, Dennis wrote: >>> > -----Original Message----- >>> > From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-rdma- >>> > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Greg Kroah-Hartman >>> > Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 12:54 PM >>> > To: Luis R. Rodriguez >>> > Cc: Marciniszyn, Mike; Borislav Petkov; Ingo Molnar; One Thousand Gnomes; >>> > Doug Ledford; linux-r...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>> > Subject: Re: Deprecating ipath >>> > >>> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 09:23:27AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >>> > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Marciniszyn, Mike >>> > > <mike.marcinis...@intel.com> wrote: >>> > > > Doug, >>> > > > >>> > > > We have been given the go ahead to start the deprecation process for >>> > thie ipath driver. >>> > > >>> > > That's great! Do you mean removal from Linux? >>> > > >>> > > > What do I need to do to get that done? >>> > > >>> > > Feature removal txt file was removed from the kernel so there is no >>> > > "schedule" per se, not sure what the process these days is for driver >>> > > removal. How about punting it to staging for a release or two and then >>> > > remove it? Not sure if that would be frowned upon or welcomed. >>> > >>> > That is the process for driver removal, so of course it is welcomed :) >>> > >>> > > That would have the cost of moving history through directories but git >>> > > --follow helps with that these days. The gain of moving it to staging >>> > > IMHO would be that if anyone who might care would need to complain >>> > may >>> > > do so for a directory change for 1-2 release may spot this easily and >>> > > the issues would be much less than an immediate removal. >>> > >>> > Yes, that's why we do it this way. >>> > >>> > Mike, feel free to send me a patch for this if you want me to queue it up >>> > for >>> > 4.3. For 4.2 it's too late. >>> > >>> > thanks, >>> > >>> > greg k-h >>> > -- >>> >>> Greg, how would you like to consume that patch? There are a number of large >>> files. We can break things up into a series and send through email. We could >>> also post a repo somewhere that you can do a pull from. Something else? >> >> If you use -M to 'git format-patch' when generating a patch, it will >> show that you just moved the files around the directory tree, and the >> patch should be quite small and easy to email and review. >> >> In fact, you should use that as a default for all patches, as it's now a >> standard that normal patch can use to consume, I have this in my >> .gitalias file: >> [alias] >> fp = format-patch -M >> >> and just use 'git fp' all the time. > > And if you still want to use default regular commands then you can use: > > [diff] > renamelimit=0
Actually this is to help trigger rename detection to be a bit more greedy, you still need -M. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/