* Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jul 2015 13:03:59 +0200
> Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> > > + /*
> > > + * In case the input is like console with text after the baud
> > > + * rate. e.g. 115200n8. kstrtoul() will error on such input.
> > > + */
> > > + for (p = s; *p && isdigit(*p); p++)
> > > + ;
> > > + *p = 0;
> > > +
> > > if (kstrtoul(s, 0, &baud) < 0 || baud == 0)
> > > baud = DEFAULT_BAUD;
> >
> >
>
> This was actually one of those cases where I wanted to show that keeping the
> old
> function around is better than the alternative ;-)
>
> If people say we need to phase out simple_strtoull(), then I wanted to show
> what
> kinds of hacks we will have if that happens.
>
> I was hoping that someone would point out that simple_strtoull() is a better
> solution. :)
LOL :)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/