> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Auger [mailto:eric.au...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 7:20 PM
> To: Wu, Feng; eric.au...@st.com; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
> kvm...@lists.cs.columbia.edu; k...@vger.kernel.org;
> christoffer.d...@linaro.org; marc.zyng...@arm.com;
> alex.william...@redhat.com; pbonz...@redhat.com; avi.kiv...@gmail.com;
> mtosa...@redhat.com; j...@8bytes.org; b.rey...@virtualopensystems.com
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; patc...@linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC 16/17] KVM: eventfd: add irq bypass consumer management
> 
> Hi Feng,
> On 07/06/2015 09:55 AM, Wu, Feng wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Eric Auger [mailto:eric.au...@linaro.org]
> >> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 9:17 PM
> >> To: eric.au...@st.com; eric.au...@linaro.org;
> >> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; kvm...@lists.cs.columbia.edu;
> >> k...@vger.kernel.org; christoffer.d...@linaro.org; marc.zyng...@arm.com;
> >> alex.william...@redhat.com; pbonz...@redhat.com; avi.kiv...@gmail.com;
> >> mtosa...@redhat.com; Wu, Feng; j...@8bytes.org;
> >> b.rey...@virtualopensystems.com
> >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; patc...@linaro.org
> >> Subject: [RFC 16/17] KVM: eventfd: add irq bypass consumer management
> >>
> >> This patch adds the registration/unregistration of an
> >> irq_bypass_consumer on irqfd assignment/deassignment.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >>  virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
> >>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> >> index f3da161..425a47b 100644
> >> --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> >> +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> >> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> >>  #include <linux/srcu.h>
> >>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> >>  #include <linux/seqlock.h>
> >> +#include <linux/irqbypass.h>
> >>  #include <trace/events/kvm.h>
> >>
> >>  #include <kvm/iodev.h>
> >> @@ -93,6 +94,7 @@ struct _irqfd {
> >>    struct list_head list;
> >>    poll_table pt;
> >>    struct work_struct shutdown;
> >> +  struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons;
> >>  };
> >>
> >>  static struct workqueue_struct *irqfd_cleanup_wq;
> >> @@ -429,7 +431,21 @@ kvm_irqfd_assign(struct kvm *kvm, struct
> kvm_irqfd
> >> *args)
> >>     */
> >>    fdput(f);
> >>
> >> -  /* irq_bypass_register_consumer(); */
> >> +  irqfd->cons = kzalloc(sizeof(struct irq_bypass_consumer),
> >> +                        GFP_KERNEL);
> >> +  if (!irqfd->cons) {
> >> +          ret = -ENOMEM;
> >> +          goto fail;
> >> +  }
> >> +  irqfd->cons->token = (void *)irqfd->eventfd;
> >> +  irqfd->cons->gsi = irqfd->gsi;
> >> +  irqfd->cons->kvm = kvm;
> >> +  irqfd->cons->add_producer = kvm_arch_add_producer;
> >> +  irqfd->cons->del_producer = kvm_arch_del_producer;
> >> +  irqfd->cons->stop_consumer = kvm_arch_stop_consumer;
> >> +  irqfd->cons->resume_consumer = kvm_arch_resume_consumer;
> >> +  ret = irq_bypass_register_consumer(irqfd->cons);
> >> +  WARN_ON(ret);
> >>
> >>    return 0;
> >>
> >> @@ -530,8 +546,6 @@ kvm_irqfd_deassign(struct kvm *kvm, struct
> kvm_irqfd
> >> *args)
> >>    struct _irqfd *irqfd, *tmp;
> >>    struct eventfd_ctx *eventfd;
> >>
> >> -  /* irq_bypass_unregister_consumer() */
> >> -
> >>    eventfd = eventfd_ctx_fdget(args->fd);
> >>    if (IS_ERR(eventfd))
> >>            return PTR_ERR(eventfd);
> >> @@ -550,6 +564,8 @@ kvm_irqfd_deassign(struct kvm *kvm, struct
> kvm_irqfd
> >> *args)
> >>                    irqfd->irq_entry.type = 0;
> >>                    write_seqcount_end(&irqfd->irq_entry_sc);
> >>                    irqfd_deactivate(irqfd);
> >> +                  irq_bypass_unregister_consumer(irqfd->cons);
> >> +                  kfree(irqfd->cons);
> >
> > There may be an issue here. 'irqfd' is freed in irqfd_deactivate() --> ...
> --.>irqfd_shutdown(),
> > and irqfd_deactivate() can be called in the other two places below:
> >     - irqfd_wakeup()
> >     - kvm_irqfd_release()
> > I think we also need to call irq_bypass_unregister_consumer() there, right?
> yes you're right. what about doing the unregistration in irqfd_shutdown
> then?

I am fine with this!

Thanks,
Feng
> 
> Thanks for spotting this.
> 
> Eric
> 
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Feng
> >
> >
> >>            }
> >>    }
> >>
> >> --
> >> 1.9.1
> >

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to