On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 03:51:20PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> If rhashtable_walk_next detects a resize operation in progress, it jumps
> to the new table and continues walking that one. But it misses to drop
> the reference to it's current item, leading it to continue traversing
> the new table's bucket in which the current item is sorted into, and
> after reaching that bucket's end continues traversing the new table's
> second bucket instead of the first one, thereby potentially missing
> items.
>
> This fixes the rhashtable runtime test for me. Bug probably introduced
> by Herbert Xu's patch eddee5ba ("rhashtable: Fix walker behaviour during
> rehash") although not explicitly tested.
>
> Fixes: eddee5ba ("rhashtable: Fix walker behaviour during rehash")
> Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <p...@nwl.cc>
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au>
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
