hi, all
thanks for reviewing.
any comments or advices are welcome :)
I am OOO tomorrow, so response may arrive later.
thanks
xinhui
On 2015年07月07日 20:43, Pan Xinhui wrote:
>
> Drivers can store their internal per-policy information in
> policy->driver_data, lets use it.
>
> we have benefits after this replacing.
> 1) memory saving.
> 2) policy is shared by several cpus, per_cpu seems not correct. using
> *driver_data* is more reasonable.
> 3) fix a memory leak in acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit. as policy->cpu might
> change during cpu hotplug. So sometimes we cant't free *data*, use
> *driver_data* to fix it.
> 4) fix a zero return value of get_cur_freq_on_cpu. Only per_cpu of
> policy->cpu is set to *data*, if we try to get cpufreq on other cpus, we
> get zero instead of correct values. Use *driver_data* to fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhuix....@intel.com>
> ---
> Changes from V1:
> codes style fix, comments update
> move cpufreq_cpu_put(policy) after we get *driver_data*
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> index 0136dfc..e7fcaa6 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -72,8 +72,6 @@ struct acpi_cpufreq_data {
> cpumask_var_t freqdomain_cpus;
> };
>
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_cpufreq_data *, acfreq_data);
> -
> /* acpi_perf_data is a pointer to percpu data. */
> static struct acpi_processor_performance __percpu *acpi_perf_data;
>
> @@ -144,7 +142,7 @@ static int _store_boost(int val)
>
> static ssize_t show_freqdomain_cpus(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
> {
> - struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu);
> + struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
>
> return cpufreq_show_cpus(data->freqdomain_cpus, buf);
> }
> @@ -327,7 +325,8 @@ static void drv_write(struct drv_cmd *cmd)
> put_cpu();
> }
>
> -static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask)
> +static u32
> +get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask, struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data)
> {
> struct acpi_processor_performance *perf;
> struct drv_cmd cmd;
> @@ -335,7 +334,7 @@ static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask)
> if (unlikely(cpumask_empty(mask)))
> return 0;
>
> - switch (per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpumask_first(mask))->cpu_feature) {
> + switch (data->cpu_feature) {
> case SYSTEM_INTEL_MSR_CAPABLE:
> cmd.type = SYSTEM_INTEL_MSR_CAPABLE;
> cmd.addr.msr.reg = MSR_IA32_PERF_CTL;
> @@ -346,7 +345,7 @@ static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask)
> break;
> case SYSTEM_IO_CAPABLE:
> cmd.type = SYSTEM_IO_CAPABLE;
> - perf = per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpumask_first(mask))->acpi_data;
> + perf = data->acpi_data;
> cmd.addr.io.port = perf->control_register.address;
> cmd.addr.io.bit_width = perf->control_register.bit_width;
> break;
> @@ -364,19 +363,24 @@ static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask)
>
> static unsigned int get_cur_freq_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> - struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpu);
> + struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data;
> + struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> unsigned int freq;
> unsigned int cached_freq;
>
> pr_debug("get_cur_freq_on_cpu (%d)\n", cpu);
>
> - if (unlikely(data == NULL ||
> - data->acpi_data == NULL || data->freq_table == NULL)) {
> + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> + if (unlikely(!policy))
> + return 0;
> +
> + data = policy->driver_data;
> + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> + if (unlikely(!data || !data->acpi_data || !data->freq_table))
> return 0;
> - }
>
> cached_freq = data->freq_table[data->acpi_data->state].frequency;
> - freq = extract_freq(get_cur_val(cpumask_of(cpu)), data);
> + freq = extract_freq(get_cur_val(cpumask_of(cpu), data), data);
> if (freq != cached_freq) {
> /*
> * The dreaded BIOS frequency change behind our back.
> @@ -397,7 +401,7 @@ static unsigned int check_freqs(const struct cpumask
> *mask, unsigned int freq,
> unsigned int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
> - cur_freq = extract_freq(get_cur_val(mask), data);
> + cur_freq = extract_freq(get_cur_val(mask, data), data);
> if (cur_freq == freq)
> return 1;
> udelay(10);
> @@ -408,7 +412,7 @@ static unsigned int check_freqs(const struct cpumask
> *mask, unsigned int freq,
> static int acpi_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> unsigned int index)
> {
> - struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu);
> + struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
> struct acpi_processor_performance *perf;
> struct drv_cmd cmd;
> unsigned int next_perf_state = 0; /* Index into perf table */
> @@ -673,7 +677,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy
> *policy)
> }
>
> data->acpi_data = per_cpu_ptr(acpi_perf_data, cpu);
> - per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpu) = data;
> + policy->driver_data = data;
>
> if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC))
> acpi_cpufreq_driver.flags |= CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS;
> @@ -843,19 +847,19 @@ err_free_mask:
> free_cpumask_var(data->freqdomain_cpus);
> err_free:
> kfree(data);
> - per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpu) = NULL;
> + policy->driver_data = NULL;
>
> return result;
> }
>
> static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> - struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu);
> + struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
>
> pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit\n");
>
> if (data) {
> - per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu) = NULL;
> + policy->driver_data = NULL;
> acpi_processor_unregister_performance(data->acpi_data,
> policy->cpu);
> free_cpumask_var(data->freqdomain_cpus);
> @@ -868,7 +872,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy
> *policy)
>
> static int acpi_cpufreq_resume(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> - struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu);
> + struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
>
> pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_resume\n");
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
