When all CPUs of a policy are hot-unplugged, we EXIT the governor but
don't mark policy->governor as NULL. This was done in order to keep last
used governor's information intact in sysfs, while the CPUs are offline.

We also missed marking policy->governor as NULL while restoring the
policy. Because of that, we call __cpufreq_governor(CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS)
for an uninitialized policy. Which eventually returns -EBUSY.

Fix this by setting policy->governor to NULL while restoring the policy.

Reported-by: Pi-Cheng Chen <pi-cheng.c...@linaro.org>
Reported-by: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <t...@linaro.org>
Fixes: 18bf3a124ef8 ("cpufreq: Mark policy->governor = NULL for inactive 
policies")
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
---
For 4.2-rc

 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index b612411655f9..2c22e3902e72 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1132,6 +1132,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy 
*cpufreq_policy_restore(unsigned int cpu)
 
                down_write(&policy->rwsem);
                policy->cpu = cpu;
+               policy->governor = NULL;
                up_write(&policy->rwsem);
        }
 
-- 
2.4.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to