Em Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 04:42:03PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu: > On 08/07/15 16:28, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 12:52:40AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra escreveu: > >> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 01:13:59PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > >>> Em Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 05:36:14PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra escreveu: > >> I was just thinking that 2 records, each with a fixed layout would be > >> easier to parse than 1 record with variable layout.
> >> The record space is immense, so from that point it really doesn't > >> matter. > > We could do a land grab at some point there, if/when we find some reason > > for that... :-) > >> Do whatever is easiest, less mistakes get made etc. :-) > >> No real preference either way, as long we we've thought about it. > > Right, I just don't want to have two u32 carrying -1 for no reason. > So you'd be OK with 2 RECORD types? Yeah, no problem. > I will see what is involved. Ok. - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
