On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 08:53:34 -0700
Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote:

> Anyway, to make a long rant more on-point, does this alternative
> version work for you?

I'll test it again, even though I already did (see below).

> 
>     diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
>     index 09c65640cad6..e85bdfd15fed 100644
>     --- a/kernel/auditsc.c
>     +++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
>     @@ -1021,8 +1021,7 @@ static int audit_log_single_execve_arg(
>              * for strings that are too long, we should not have created
>              * any.
>              */
>     -       if (unlikely((len == 0) || len > MAX_ARG_STRLEN - 1)) {
>     -               WARN_ON(1);
>     +       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(len < 0 || len > MAX_ARG_STRLEN - 1)) {
>                     send_sig(SIGKILL, current, 0);
>                     return -1;
>             }
> 
> because that really looks better to me.
> 

That was what I originally did ;-)  But then I figured I would just
revert the patch with a simple:

  git show 0b08c5e59441d | patch -p1 -R

and submit that.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to