On 07/09/2015 03:59 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Having failed to bisect, let's look at the trace:
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Sasha Levin <sasha.le...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> [3157054.661763] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> [3157054.662552] kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:533!
>> [3157054.663277] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
>> [3157054.664164] Dumping ftrace buffer:
>> [3157054.664740] (ftrace buffer empty)
>> [3157054.665274] Modules linked in:
>> [3157054.665768] CPU: 16 PID: 11446 Comm: trinity-main Not tainted
>> 4.1.0-next-20150703-sasha-00040-gd868f14-dirty #2292
>> [3157054.667203] task: ffff880408813000 ti: ffff8803d29c8000 task.ti:
>> ffff8803d29c8000
>> [3157054.668256] RIP: do_nmi (arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:533 (discriminator 1))
>> [3157054.669378] RSP: 0018:ffff88077800bed8 EFLAGS: 00010006
>> [3157054.670141]
>> ==================================================================
>> [3157054.671268] BUG: KASan: out of bounds on stack in
>> __show_regs+0x7f6/0x940 at addr ffff88077800be50
>
> I bet that__show_regs interacts poorly with KASan for some reason.
> But that's not the underlying bug. In fact, the bad read is quite
> close the RSP, so this is almost certainly a bug in KASan or
> __show_regs.
>
>> [3157054.674604] Read of size 8 by task trinity-main/11446
>> [3157054.676521] page:ffffea001de002c0 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:
>> (null) index:0x0
>> [3157054.679451] flags: 0x42fffff80000400(reserved)
>> [3157054.681237] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
>> [3157054.683326] CPU: 16 PID: 11446 Comm: trinity-main Not tainted
>> 4.1.0-next-20150703-sasha-00040-gd868f14-dirty #2292
>> [3157054.687097] ffff88077800be50 000000009c65e33f ffff88077800b9f8
>> ffffffffa0ac8938
>> [3157054.690303] 1ffffd4003bc0058 ffff88077800ba88 ffff88077800ba78
>> ffffffff9759796e
>> [3157054.693365] ffff88077800bab8 ffffffffa0abe0b3 0000000000000082
>> ffffffffa2fe39e4
>> [3157054.696209] Call Trace:
>> [3157054.697180] <NMI> dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:52)
>> [3157054.699390] kasan_report_error (mm/kasan/report.c:132
>> mm/kasan/report.c:193)
>> [3157054.701663] ? printk (kernel/printk/printk.c:1896)
>> [3157054.703531] ? bitmap_weight (include/linux/bitmap.h:303)
>> [3157054.705553] __asan_report_load8_noabort (mm/kasan/report.c:230
>> mm/kasan/report.c:251)
>> [3157054.708014] ? __show_regs (arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c:68)
>> [3157054.710046] __show_regs (arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c:68)
>> [3157054.712066] ? printk (kernel/printk/printk.c:1896)
>> [3157054.713878] ? bitmap_weight (include/linux/bitmap.h:303)
>> [3157054.715875] ? start_thread_common.constprop.0
>> (arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c:58)
>> [3157054.718336] ? dump_stack_print_info (kernel/printk/printk.c:3121)
>> [3157054.720619] show_regs (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c:313)
>> [3157054.722530] __die (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:294)
>> [3157054.724290] die (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:316)
>> [3157054.725962] do_trap (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:214
>> arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:260)
>> [3157054.727805] do_error_trap (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:298
>> include/linux/jump_label.h:125 include/linux/context_tracking_state.h:29
>> include/linux/context_tracking.h:46 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:302)
>> [3157054.729843] ? do_device_not_available (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:291)
>> [3157054.732211] ? do_nmi (arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:533 (discriminator 1))
>> [3157054.734101] ? kvm_clock_read (./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:87
>> arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c:86)
>> [3157054.736165] ? sched_clock (arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c:305)
>> [3157054.738126] ? nmi_handle (arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:134)
>> [3157054.740133] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk (arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.S:40)
>> [3157054.742997] do_invalid_op (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:313)
>> [3157054.744991] invalid_op (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:925)
>
> So we got #UD somewhere...
>
>> [3157054.746873] ? do_nmi (arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:533 (discriminator 1))
>> [3157054.748769] ? do_nmi (arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:515
>> arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:531)
>> [3157054.750658] end_repeat_nmi (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:1435)
>
> ...here, perhaps?
>
Huh? Perhaps here:
kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:533
We are in the middle of processing BUG_ON()
IOW, we hit BUG_ON(). BUG_ON() handler calls __show_regs(), for some reason
kasan to complains here
and prints backtrace of bad access.
So, after cutting off all kasan reports:
[3157054.661763] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[3157054.662552] kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:533!
[3157054.663277] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
[3157054.664164] Dumping ftrace buffer:
[3157054.664740] (ftrace buffer empty)
[3157054.665274] Modules linked in:
[3157054.665768] CPU: 16 PID: 11446 Comm: trinity-main Not tainted
4.1.0-next-20150703-sasha-00040-gd868f14-dirty #2292
[3157054.667203] task: ffff880408813000 ti: ffff8803d29c8000 task.ti:
ffff8803d29c8000
[3157054.668256] RIP: do_nmi (arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:533 (discriminator 1))
[3157054.669378] RSP: 0018:ffff88077800bed8 EFLAGS: 00010006
[3157054.784428] RAX: 0000000080120001 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX:
00000000c0000101
[3157054.801838] RDX: 1ffffffff4691cd0 RSI: ffffffffa0c10620 RDI:
ffffffffa344dc00
[3157054.891910] RBP: ffff88077800bee8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09:
000000000000002e
[3157055.191450] pps pps0: PPS event at 4682.682479766
[3157055.191456] pps pps0: capture assert seq #4932
[3157055.196385] R10: ffffed014e1e4883 R11: ffffed014e1e4881 R12:
ffff88077800bef8
[3157055.416083] R13: 000b375311a5d4ab R14: ffffffffa3485190 R15:
ffffffffa3485180
[3157055.418637] FS: 00007f6d93c6f700(0000) GS:ffff880778000000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[3157055.421726] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[3157055.423798] CR2: 0000000004378000 CR3: 00000003d2987000 CR4:
00000000000007e0
[3157055.426363] DR0: ffffffff81000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:
0000000000000000
[3157055.428933] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7:
0000000000000600
[3157055.431526] Stack:
[3157055.432310] 0000000000000001 0000000004378000 ffff88077800be98
ffffffffa0b2ff6f
[3157055.435066] ffffffffa3485180 ffffffffa3485190 000b375311a5d4ab
0000000000000000
[3157055.437846] ffff88077800be98 dffffc0000000000 ffffed014e1e4881
ffffed014e1e4883
[3157055.440612] Call Trace:
[3157055.441576] <NMI>
[3157055.442347] end_repeat_nmi (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:1435)
[3157055.444426] ? debug (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:1067)
[3157055.446211] ? debug (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:1067)
[3157055.447992] ? debug (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:1067)
[3157055.449762] <<EOE>>
[3157055.450579] <#DB> [3157055.451465] ? nmi_handle (arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:134
include/linux/jump_label.h:125 include/trace/events/nmi.h:10
arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:135)
[3157055.453456] <<EOE>>
> Do you know what line 1435 was in the version you tested? There
> shouldn't be funny instructions in end_repeat_nmi, though. Did we end
> up off an instruction boundary?
>
> Here's my wild guess. The repeat_nmi thing is really rare. What if
> there's a CPU or emulator that can't do mov %cr2, %r12 or vice versa?
> mov from cr has a somewhat unusual encoding. What platform is this?
> Does KASan play games that would cause KVM to emulate a mov to or from
> cr2?
>
I can't tell you what and how KVM emulates anything, but kasan just maps some
memory at
certain location and read/writes it. That's it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
