On 8/1/05, Lukasz Kosewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Patch 03: Have sata_promise use the perfect, flawless API from the > previous patch
Hmmm... Flawless :) Then I must have found an undocumented feature! I've applied this set of patches to a 2.6.11 kernel (with few problems) and ran into a bunch of "scheduling while atomic" errors when hotplugging a drive, culprit being probably scsi_sysfs.c where scsi_remove_device locks a mutex, or perhaps when it then calls class_device_unregister, which does a 'down_write'. Perhaps we need some sort of workqueue for hotplug requests to get them out of the atomic interrupt handler context where they originate? -- Jim Ramsay "Me fail English? That's unpossible!" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
