Previously we printed, e.g.,
do_IRQ: 0.242 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)
There's no clue about what "0.242" means, and the IRQ number, which is the
important generic information used by drivers and /proc/interrupts, is
almost an afterthought.
Change the format to this:
No handler for IRQ -1 (CPU 0 vector 0xf2)
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
index 2949c6e..3c6b069 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -224,9 +224,8 @@ __visible unsigned int __irq_entry do_IRQ(struct pt_regs
*regs)
ack_APIC_irq();
if (irq != IRQ_RETRIGGERED) {
- pr_emerg_ratelimited("%s: %d.%d No irq handler for
vector (irq %d)\n",
- __func__, smp_processor_id(),
- vector, irq);
+ pr_emerg_ratelimited("No handler for IRQ %d (CPU %d
vector %#x)\n",
+ irq, smp_processor_id(), vector);
} else {
__this_cpu_write(vector_irq[vector], IRQ_UNDEFINED);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
