On 10-07-15, 14:36, Pan Xinhui wrote: > > As policy->cpu may not be same in acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init and > acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit. There is a risk that we use different *cpu* to > un/register acpi performance. So acpi_processor_unregister_performance > may not be able to do the cleanup work. That causes a memory leak. And > if there will be another acpi_processor_register_performance call, it > may also fail thanks to the internal check of pr->performace. > > So we add a field *acpi_perf_cpu* to fix this issue. > > Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhuix....@intel.com> > --- > Change from V1: > comments update > --- > drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
