> Wrong. Reference: > > http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/General/c_book/c_book/chapter8/sequen > ce_points.html > > Cheers, > Dick Johnson
That discussion is wrong. The form of the argument is simply invalid. Just because an optimization could break things in some cases doesnt mean the compiler cant ever make the optimization. It just cant make the optimization in the case that breaks things. And by things I mean things that are defined in the standard that would be broken, not things outside of it. DS - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/