Horst wrote:
> > - if ('\n' == *type) {
> > + if (!*type || '\n' == *type) {
>
> Redundant. If *type == '\n', it is certainly != 0.
No - I don't think redundant, at least not this change in isolation.
Perhaps redundant in light of subsequent code lines, as Jesper notes in
his followup.
But it is confusing to read - poor and inconsistent choice of code
phrasing.
If the patch had read as:
- if (*type == '\n') {
+ if (*type == '\n' || *type == '\0') {
then it would be clearer to the reader in my view. A check for newline
is changed to a check for newline or nul-byte.
(Yes - I recognize that one is not given the freedom to change the
-old- lines in a patch for the sake of clarity ;).
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
