On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 02:46:25PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > On 07/15/2015 01:27 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > using _regulator_get() I think. A separate, rarely used, path is likely > > to have this sort of issue. > Exactly, do you agree then that a try_module_get() is missing in set_supply()? > It is OK if I add that in the same patch in v2 or do you prefer that to be > in a separate patch? A separate patch would be better, or even better would be something that just replaces everything there with use of the same code path as _get() (thanks for volunteering!) but just adding the try_module_get() is fine for now.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
