On 07/15/2015 09:27 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
New title, I originally posted this last night but I've now made
a little progress in identifying what changed.  Previous thread was
labelled for AMD Phenom, but it is more general.  CC'ing Jeff
because he replied to the original, I guess he probably won't be
interested after this.

Yesterday was the first day I had done any real compiling with
4.2-rc.  I started out using -rc1, and make -j4 on a recent LFS/BLFS
system (gcc-5.1.0, make-4.1, etc).  I wanted to start trying to
build kde5, and I expected a lot of issues.  What I did not expect
was that qt5 would build as if I was using -j1.

Examination eventually identified that with 4.2-rc1 and 4.2-rc2,
make ran the number of jobs I had specified, but the total of the
CPU percentages ('top' from procps-ng-3.3.10) maxed out at 100%.  On
4.1 kernels the percentage with -j4 maxes out at 400% (my machine
has 4 cores).  I suspected either an unfortunate choice in 'make
oldconfig', or something specific to an AMD Phenom / gcc-5.1.

Today I have tried make -j4 on two other machines with 4.2-rc
kernels [ building the current git stable release ].  On my i3
SandyBridge everything was fine, CPU usage approached 400%.  On my
AMD A10-7850K I have the same problem as on the phenom.  Not
surprising, I began by using the Phenom config when I got the A10,
then adapted it to suit, whereas the i3 has much less memory so I
haven't made many changes since I got it.

Comparing the configs for the i3 and the A10, the first thing which
looked as if it might be relevant was the _CPU_ACCOUNTING choices.
Those on the A10 seem to be driven from CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL so I began
by changing that to CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE.  Payday ;-)  make -j4 now
approaches 400% CPU usage.

The config differences follow.  Perhaps it is actually one of the
subsequent choices that is the problem.  And I guess it could still
be a gcc-5.1 issue.


Before going nuts bisecting, it could be worth running perf record -a -g -e cycles (or perhaps -e task-clock instead of -e cycles). It could also be worth manually sampling /proc/PID/stack a few times for a process that isn't making as much progress as it should.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to