3.19.8-ckt4 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me 
know.

------------------

From: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>

commit 2f993cf093643b98477c421fa2b9a98dcc940323 upstream.

While looking for other users of get_state/cond_sync. I Found
ring_buffer_attach() and it looks obviously buggy?

Don't we need to ensure that we have "synchronize" _between_
list_del() and list_add() ?

IOW. Suppose that ring_buffer_attach() preempts right_after
get_state_synchronize_rcu() and gp completes before spin_lock().

In this case cond_synchronize_rcu() does nothing and we reuse
->rb_entry without waiting for gp in between?

It also moves the ->rcu_pending check under "if (rb)", to make it
more readable imo.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shish...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brge...@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlas...@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: d...@stgolabs.net
Cc: der.h...@hofr.at
Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org
Cc: t...@kernel.org
Fixes: b69cf53640da ("perf: Fix a race between ring_buffer_detach() and 
ring_buffer_attach()")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150530200425.ga15...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <ka...@canonical.com>
---
 kernel/events/core.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 7959624..b59b7b0 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -4057,20 +4057,20 @@ static void ring_buffer_attach(struct perf_event *event,
                WARN_ON_ONCE(event->rcu_pending);
 
                old_rb = event->rb;
-               event->rcu_batches = get_state_synchronize_rcu();
-               event->rcu_pending = 1;
-
                spin_lock_irqsave(&old_rb->event_lock, flags);
                list_del_rcu(&event->rb_entry);
                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&old_rb->event_lock, flags);
-       }
 
-       if (event->rcu_pending && rb) {
-               cond_synchronize_rcu(event->rcu_batches);
-               event->rcu_pending = 0;
+               event->rcu_batches = get_state_synchronize_rcu();
+               event->rcu_pending = 1;
        }
 
        if (rb) {
+               if (event->rcu_pending) {
+                       cond_synchronize_rcu(event->rcu_batches);
+                       event->rcu_pending = 0;
+               }
+
                spin_lock_irqsave(&rb->event_lock, flags);
                list_add_rcu(&event->rb_entry, &rb->event_list);
                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rb->event_lock, flags);
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to