Hi Andrew,

After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:

arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S: Assembler messages:
arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S:108: Error: __NR_syscalls is not equal to the 
size of the syscall table

Caused by commit

  d221fc1f0f25 ("mm: mlock: add new mlock, munlock, and munlockall system 
calls")

I have added the following fix patch for today:

From: Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:58:53 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] mm: mlock: fix for add new mlock, munlock, and munlockall 
system calls

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/unistd.h | 2 +-
 arch/arm/kernel/calls.S       | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/unistd.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/unistd.h
index 32640c431a08..2516c09d65d7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/unistd.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/unistd.h
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
  * This may need to be greater than __NR_last_syscall+1 in order to
  * account for the padding in the syscall table
  */
-#define __NR_syscalls  (388)
+#define __NR_syscalls  (392)
 
 /*
  * *NOTE*: This is a ghost syscall private to the kernel.  Only the
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/calls.S b/arch/arm/kernel/calls.S
index 514e77b26414..88808221383b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/calls.S
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/calls.S
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@
                CALL(sys_execveat)
                CALL(sys_mlock2)
                CALL(sys_munlock2)
-/* 400 */      CALL(sys_munlockall2)
+/* 390 */      CALL(sys_munlockall2)
 #ifndef syscalls_counted
 .equ syscalls_padding, ((NR_syscalls + 3) & ~3) - NR_syscalls
 #define syscalls_counted
-- 
2.1.4

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    s...@canb.auug.org.au
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to