On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 09:43:55AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> I was tempted to do this as well, but what about
> domain_remove_dev_info() where we also handle vm domains specially and
> don't do a symmetric detach in both directions? I started down that
> path but quickly found the code to fragile to make those kinds of
> changes. Thanks,
Okay, so domain_remove_dev_info() does:
if (domain_type_is_vm(domain)) {
iommu_detach_dependent_devices(info->iommu, info->dev);
domain_detach_iommu(domain, info->iommu);
}
... in a loop over all devices attached to the domain. The first
function (iommu_detach_dependent_devices) is not special to vm-domains.
In fact, domain_remove_one_dev_info calls it for all domain types.
And domain_detach_iommu only clears the bit in the iommu_bmp of the
domain, which is also not special and also called for all domain types
in domain_remove_one_dev_info.
So it looks like this special handling has no real purpose and is just
part of the whole mess. I am currently working on the conversion of the
Intel VT-d driver to use default-domains from the iommu-core. When this
is done we can get rid of that mess.
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
