On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:22:40PM -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> + for (i = 0; i < elt->map->n_fields; i++) {
> + atomic64_set(&dup_elt->fields[i].sum,
> + atomic64_read(&elt->fields[i].sum));
> + dup_elt->fields[i].cmp_fn = elt->fields[i].cmp_fn;
> + }
> +
> + return dup_elt;
> +}
So there is a lot of atomic64_{set,read}() in this patch set, what kind
of magic properties do you assume they have?
Note that atomic*_{set,read}() are weaker than {WRITE,READ}_ONCE(), so
if you're assuming they do that, you're mistaken -- although it is on a
TODO list someplace to go fix that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
