On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Roman Zippel wrote: > On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Yup. Let's get m68k into buildable shape for 2.6.13 with Al's minimal > > patches, and if you have further improvements over that submit them as > > split up patches through the usual channels. Having all architectures > > actually build and work from mainline is really important to have > > useful kernel package in distributions. > > No, there has been no discussion of these patches, so there is no point in > doing this a few days before 2.6.13. Can we please do this properly for > 2.6.14?
Notwithstanding the actual content of the patches, I agree there's indeed no need to hurry (unless Christoph's unifying Debian kernel hat is weighting a lot). A few months of delay for 2.6.14 is almost unnoticeable on the Linux/m68k timescale anyway ;-) Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/