On 2015/7/15 19:20, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 06:49:40PM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu:
On 2015/7/14 23:36, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
I have the trees cloned and plan to follow these instructions to have this test
passing, to then move on to the next patches, but one request, please change
the above to produce:
38: Test LLVM searching and compiling :(no clang) Ok
run 'perf test -v LLVM' for instructions on having a clang environment
The output format you desire is hard to implement, because 'Ok' is printed
by the parent process. We have to find a way to allow child process to pass
'run 'perf test -v LLVM' for ...' to parent, then parent can print it
after 'Ok'.
I change this test as follow:
From a quick look: excellent, thanks for improving this, I downloaded
llvm and clang, built it, and the test passes, will apply this new patch
and continue from there,
- Arnaldo
Hi Arnaldo,
What's the reviewing going on?
I collected some more patches on my git tree to avoid losting, and will
collect more on it.
I'll keep this patchset at the bottom so I think you shoud not be affected.
Here is the new branch:
https://github.com/WangNan0/linux.git ebpf
Do you want me to keep the original perf/ebpf-for-acme branch?
Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
