On 16/07/15 19:19, Will Deacon wrote:
Notes: To be honest these if not/else/endif macros are simply more readable than the original macro and that might be enough to justify them on their own. However below is an example that is needlessly hard to write without them because ICC_PMR_EL1 is a C pre-processor macro..macro disable_irq, tmp mov \tmp, #ICC_PMR_EL1_MASKED alternative_if_not ARM64_HAS_SYSREG_GIC_CPUIF msr daifset, #2 alternative_else msr_s ICC_PMR_EL1, \tmp alternative_endif .endm The new macros have received a fair degree of testing because I have based my (not published since March) pseudo-NMI patch set on them.After some consideration, I think I prefer your suggestion over what we currently have in mainline. However, there are a bunch of patches that are candidates for 4.3 which will conflict horribly with this. Would you be able to: (1) Split this up so that you have a patch introducing the new macro, then a patch converting entry.S and cache.S then a separate one for kvm/hyp.S? (2) Keep alternative_insn around for the moment (3) Once the dust has settled for 4.3, we can see how easy the old macro is to remove Sound ok to you?
Absolutely fine. I will get the split out patches posted soon. Daniel. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
