Hello, On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 05:35:09PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > Initializing wq unbound cpumask to housekeeping_mask is still the > plan. I just remember we didn't do it in Lai's series because it > was slightly unrelated. When a patchset is complicated, like Lai's, > it's better to keep it focus to a single purpose. > > Anyway that patch is welcome.
Ah, cool, can you ack it explicitly? > > Yeah, I think I asked Lai to try a different approach where we > > regulate it from queueing path rather than playing with pwqs. I think > > that'd end up quite a bit simpler. > > Ordered workqueues aren't handled currently? I tried setting the unbound > cpumask and it also applied to khelper which is a singlethread (and thus > ordered) workqueue. Hmmm... AFAICS, it shouldn't work. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
