On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 06:34:22PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <[email protected]> > > Ingo, > > You had asked for this to be kept in my tree until the end of the > merge window. I sent it a bit earlier than the end of the merge window, > it failed to apply to Boris' tree as my series was based on linux-next > and then I went on a small vacation. Boris is now on vacation as well. > I've respinned this series today -- and fortunatley both of the patches > in this series apply to both Linus' tree and linux-next, I am in hopes > it applies to any other tree as well without conflicts. If not it should > be easy to respin with the Coccinelle SmPL rule defined. > > I'll note that there are a few outstanding series related to MTRR, but > those do not have conflicts with these patches at all so feel free > to consider these before or after. Also I tried to get an ack for the > first patch [1] but that has gone under the radar I believe so > merging it now as part of this series and Cc'ing the maintainers. > That change is needed in order to make the code match the grammar > used by Coccinelle used in the expressed transformation. > > [0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] > [1] > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] > > Luis R. Rodriguez (2): > drivers/dma/iop-adma: Use dma_alloc_writecombine() kernel-style > dma: rename dma_*_writecombine() to dma_*_wc()
This series requires some adjustments based on linux-next. Do we accept renames on -rcs? If so should I respin? If its too late for v4.2 I can try to shoot for v4.3 but timing sending this at the right exact time seems a bit hard so any advice for that is highly appreciated. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
