Hi, On (07/18/15 07:42), Minchan Kim wrote: > I asked to remove the comment of zs_can_compact about lock. > "Should be called under class->lock."
Oh... I somehow quickly read it and thought you were talking about the commit message. Fixed and resent. > Otherwise, > > Acked-by: Minchan Kim <[email protected]> Thanks. -ss > > --- > > mm/zsmalloc.c | 2 -- > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c > > index 1edd8a0..ed64cf5 100644 > > --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c > > +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c > > @@ -1836,9 +1836,7 @@ static unsigned long zs_shrinker_count(struct > > shrinker *shrinker, > > if (class->index != i) > > continue; > > > > - spin_lock(&class->lock); > > pages_to_free += zs_can_compact(class); > > - spin_unlock(&class->lock); > > } > > > > return pages_to_free; > > -- > > 2.4.6 > > > > -- > Kind regards, > Minchan Kim > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
