4.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanass...@sandisk.com>
commit a44074f14ba1ea0747ea737026eb929b81993dc3 upstream.
Although it is possible to let SRP I/O continue if a reconnect
results in a reduction of the number of channels, the current
code does not handle this scenario correctly. Instead of making
the reconnect code more complex, consider this as a reconnection
failure.
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanass...@sandisk.com>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sa...@mellanox.com>
Cc: Sebastian Parschauer <sebastian.rie...@profitbricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledf...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
@@ -1242,11 +1242,8 @@ static int srp_rport_reconnect(struct sr
for (i = 0; i < target->ch_count; i++) {
ch = &target->ch[i];
- if (ret || !ch->target) {
- if (i > 1)
- ret = 0;
+ if (ret || !ch->target)
break;
- }
ret = srp_connect_ch(ch, multich);
multich = true;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
