hi, all
ia64-acpi-cpufreq has similar issues with acpi-cpufreq. Maybe we need
make other two patches.
Replace struct cpufreq_acpi_io *acpi_io_data[NR_CPUS] with policy->driver_data,
and Fix an acpi perf unregister issue.
As two patches
[1/2] Drop the unused first argument of acpi_processor_unregister_performance().
[2/2] Drop the now redundant acpi_data pointer from acpi_cpufreq_data.
are going into the kernel tree, If I send my patches to you now, there will be
some conflicts.
So I may wait for a couple of days until all previous patches merged into
kernel tree.
thanks
xinhui
On 2015年07月20日 14:24, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> From: Pan Xinhui <xinhuix....@intel.com>
>
> freq_table should be alloced in ->init and freed in ->exit. However it
> does not be freed. Fix this memory leak in acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhuix....@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/ia64-acpi-cpufreq.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ia64-acpi-cpufreq.c
> b/drivers/cpufreq/ia64-acpi-cpufreq.c
> index 27cef0c..e02bd15 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ia64-acpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ia64-acpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit (
> acpi_io_data[policy->cpu] = NULL;
> acpi_processor_unregister_performance(&data->acpi_data,
> policy->cpu);
> + kfree(policy->freq_table);
> kfree(data);
> }
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
