On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 12:18 +0000, Madalin-Cristian Bucur wrote: > Hi Joakim > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Joakim Tjernlund [mailto:joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se] > > Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 10:57 AM > > To: linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org; net...@vger.kernel.org; Bucur Madalin- > > Cristian-B32716 > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 02/10] dpaa_eth: add support for DPAA Ethernet > > > > On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 09:54 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 19:19 +0300, Madalin Bucur wrote: > > > > This introduces the Freescale Data Path Acceleration Architecture > > > > (DPAA) Ethernet driver (dpaa_eth) that builds upon the DPAA QMan, > > > > BMan, PAMU and FMan drivers to deliver Ethernet connectivity on > > > > the Freescale DPAA QorIQ platforms. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Madalin Bucur <madalin.bu...@freescale.com> > > > > --- > > > .... > > > > + snprintf(net_dev->name, IFNAMSIZ, "fm%d-mac%d", > > > > + dpa_mac_fman_index_get(pdev), > > > > + dpa_mac_hw_index_get(pdev)); > > > > > > Should ethernet drivers dictate interface name in user space nowadays? > > > I would prefer if you didn't. > > The preformatted interface name was thought as a helper for quick interface > identification. It also ensures constant naming of the interfaces, i.e. if you > add/remove PCI network cards. One can make use of udev rules to override > default interface names ("eth%d") in userspace.
I am not well versed in ethernet interface naming but I think you are just creating another name space here. To me one either have the old eth%d names or let udev do the naming so there is some order w.r.t interface naming. I also find it handy to be able to control which I/F is eth0 etc. just by changing the order they are listed in the device tree. This makes our application happy :) > > Another reason for using this is that the interface name was also used for the > debugfs file name and when compiling dpaa_eth as a module there was a > problem with udev concurrently renaming interfaces from eth0 to something > like fmx-macy, making the next probed DPAA interface temporarily get the > eth0 name (before being renamed fmx-macw). Subsequently, > the debugfs_create_file(net_dev->name,...) call failed because of duplicated > names. > > If this is considered more of a bug than a feature, I can remove it and only > change > the naming of the debugfs entries to avoid the udev issue. Perhaps netdev list can advise? Jocke-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/