From: Stas Sergeev <s...@list.ru>

fixed_phy_register() currently hardcodes the fixed PHY link to 1, and
expects to find a "speed" parameter to provide correct information
towards the fixed PHY consumer.

In a subsequent change, where we allow "managed" (e.g: (RS)GMII in-band
status auto-negotiation) fixed PHYs, none of these parameters can be
provided since they will be auto-negotiated, hence, we just provide a
zero-initialized fixed_phy_status to fixed_phy_register() which makes it
fail when we call fixed_phy_update_regs() since status.speed = 0 which
makes us hit the "default" label and error out.

Without this change, we would also see potentially inconsistent
speed/duplex parameters for fixed PHYs when the link is DOWN.

CC: net...@vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <s...@users.sourceforge.net>
[florian: add more background to why this is correct and desirable]
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/phy/fixed_phy.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/fixed_phy.c b/drivers/net/phy/fixed_phy.c
index 1960b46add65..479b93f9581c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/fixed_phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/fixed_phy.c
@@ -52,6 +52,10 @@ static int fixed_phy_update_regs(struct fixed_phy *fp)
        u16 lpagb = 0;
        u16 lpa = 0;
 
+       if (!fp->status.link)
+               goto done;
+       bmsr |= BMSR_LSTATUS | BMSR_ANEGCOMPLETE;
+
        if (fp->status.duplex) {
                bmcr |= BMCR_FULLDPLX;
 
@@ -96,15 +100,13 @@ static int fixed_phy_update_regs(struct fixed_phy *fp)
                }
        }
 
-       if (fp->status.link)
-               bmsr |= BMSR_LSTATUS | BMSR_ANEGCOMPLETE;
-
        if (fp->status.pause)
                lpa |= LPA_PAUSE_CAP;
 
        if (fp->status.asym_pause)
                lpa |= LPA_PAUSE_ASYM;
 
+done:
        fp->regs[MII_PHYSID1] = 0;
        fp->regs[MII_PHYSID2] = 0;
 
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to