On 07/21/2015 02:15 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 06:12:15PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> Yes, if you start out false, you must be unlikely. If you start out
>> true, you must be likely.
>>
>> We could maybe try and untangle that if there really is a good use case,
>> but this is the current state.
>>
>> The whole reason this happened is because 'false' is like:
>>
>>
>>      ...
>>      <nop>
>> 1:
>>      ...
>>
>>
>>
>> label:
>>      <unlikely code>
>>      jmp 1b
>>
>>
>> Where the code if out-of-line by default. The enable will rewrite the
>> <nop> with a jmp label.
> Btw, native_sched_clock() is kinda botched because of that, see below.
>
> I'd want that RDTSC to come first with a NOP preceding it which can
> become a JMP in case some idiotic CPU can't do RDTSC and needs to use
> jiffies. Instead, we *unconditionally* jump to RDTSC which is WTF?! We
> can just as well do a normal unlikely() without the static_key:

hmmm...so this is a case where need to the default the branch
to the out-of-line branch at boot. That is, we can't just enable
the out-of-line branch at boot time, b/c it might be too late at
that point? IE native_sched_clock() gets called very early?

Thanks,

-Jason

>
>       .globl  native_sched_clock
>       .type   native_sched_clock, @function
> native_sched_clock:
>       pushq   %rbp    #
>       movq    %rsp, %rbp      #,
> #APP
> # 21 "./arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h" 1
>       1:.byte 0x0f,0x1f,0x44,0x00,0
>       .pushsection __jump_table,  "aw" 
>        .balign 8 
>        .quad 1b, .L122, __use_tsc     #,
>       .popsection 
>       
> # 0 "" 2
> #NO_APP
>       movabsq $-4294667296000000, %rax        #, tmp118
>       popq    %rbp    #
>       imulq   $1000000, jiffies_64(%rip), %rdx        #, jiffies_64, D.28443
>       addq    %rdx, %rax      # D.28443, D.28443
>       ret
> .L122:
> #APP
> # 118 "./arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h" 1
>       rdtsc
> # 0 "" 2
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to