On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:53:09 +0300 "Kirill A. Shutemov" 
<kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> MPX setups private anonymous mapping, but uses vma->vm_ops too.
> This can confuse core VM, as it relies on vm->vm_ops to distinguish
> file VMAs from anonymous.
> 
> As result we will get SIGBUS, because handle_pte_fault() thinks it's
> file VMA without vm_ops->fault and it doesn't know how to handle the
> situation properly.
> 
> Let's fix that by not setting ->vm_ops.
> 
> We don't really need ->vm_ops here: MPX VMA can be detected with VM_MPX
> flag. And vma_merge() will not merge MPX VMA with non-MPX VMA, because
> ->vm_flags won't match.
> 
> The only thing left is name of VMA. I'm not sure if it's part of ABI, or
> we can just drop it. The patch keep it by providing arch_vma_name() on x86.
> 
> Build tested only.

mpx.c has changed.

arch/x86/mm/mpx.c: In function 'try_unmap_single_bt':
arch/x86/mm/mpx.c:930: error: implicit declaration of function 'is_mpx_vma'

I'll drop this patch and see what happens.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to