On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 09:02:14PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 07:54:36PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 07:08:11PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > That would be bad, how can we force it to emit 5 bytes?
> > 
> > .byte 0xe9 like we used to do in static_cpu_has_safe().
> 
> Like so then?
> 
> static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch_jump(struct static_key *key, 
> bool inv)
> {
>       unsigned long kval = (unsigned long)key + inv;
> 
>       asm_volatile_goto("1:"
>               ".byte 0xe9\n\t .long %l[l_yes]\n\t"
>               ".pushsection __jump_table,  \"aw\" \n\t"
>               _ASM_ALIGN "\n\t"
>               _ASM_PTR "1b, %l[l_yes], %c0 \n\t"
>               ".popsection \n\t"
>               : :  "i" (kval) : : l_yes);
> 
>       return false;
> l_yes:
>       return true;
> }

Yap.

But, we can do even better and note down what kind of JMP the compiler
generated and teach __jump_label_transform() to generate the right one.
Maybe this struct jump_entry would get a flags member or so. This way
we're optimal.

Methinks...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to