On Fri, 24 Jul 2015, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2015, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/gfp.h b/include/linux/gfp.h
> > index 531c72d..104a027 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/gfp.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/gfp.h
> > @@ -321,8 +321,12 @@ static inline struct page *alloc_pages_node(int nid,
> > gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > unsigned int order)
> > {
> > /* Unknown node is current (or closest) node */
> > - if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> > + if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
> > nid = numa_mem_id();
> > + } else if (!node_online(nid)) {
> > + VM_WARN_ON(!node_online(nid));
> > + nid = numa_mem_id();
> > + }
>
> I would think you would only want this for debugging purposes. The
> overwhelming majority of hardware out there has no memory
> onlining/offlining capability after all and this adds the overhead to each
> call to alloc_pages_node.
>
> Make this dependo n CONFIG_VM_DEBUG or some such thing?
>
Yeah, the suggestion was for VM_WARN_ON() in the conditional, but the
placement has changed somewhat because of the new __alloc_pages_node(). I
think
else if (VM_WARN_ON(!node_online(nid)))
nid = numa_mem_id();
should be fine since it only triggers for CONFIG_DEBUG_VM.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
