On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
<[email protected]> wrote:
> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <[email protected]>
>
> The CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER is mostly disabled these days, so skip
> timeout setting for these kernels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_filesystem.sh | 25 
> ++++++++++++++++++-----
>  tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_userhelper.sh | 12 ++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_filesystem.sh 
> b/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_filesystem.sh
> index 3fc6c10c2479..c4366dc74e01 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_filesystem.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_filesystem.sh
> @@ -9,7 +9,15 @@ modprobe test_firmware
>
>  DIR=/sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware
>
> -OLD_TIMEOUT=$(cat /sys/class/firmware/timeout)
> +# CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER has a sysfs class under /sys/class/firmware/
> +# These days no one enables CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER so check for that
> +# as an indicator for CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER.
> +HAS_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER=$(if [ -d /sys/class/firmware/ ]; then echo yes; 
> else echo no; fi)
> +
> +if [ "$HAS_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER" = "yes" ]; then
> +       OLD_TIMEOUT=$(cat /sys/class/firmware/timeout)
> +fi
> +
>  OLD_FWPATH=$(cat /sys/module/firmware_class/parameters/path)
>
>  FWPATH=$(mktemp -d)
> @@ -17,7 +25,9 @@ FW="$FWPATH/test-firmware.bin"
>
>  test_finish()
>  {
> -       echo "$OLD_TIMEOUT" >/sys/class/firmware/timeout
> +       if [ "$HAS_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER" = "yes" ]; then
> +               echo "$OLD_TIMEOUT" >/sys/class/firmware/timeout
> +       fi
>         echo -n "$OLD_PATH" >/sys/module/firmware_class/parameters/path
>         rm -f "$FW"
>         rmdir "$FWPATH"
> @@ -25,8 +35,11 @@ test_finish()
>
>  trap "test_finish" EXIT
>
> -# Turn down the timeout so failures don't take so long.
> -echo 1 >/sys/class/firmware/timeout
> +if [ "$HAS_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER" = "yes" ]; then
> +       # Turn down the timeout so failures don't take so long.
> +       echo 1 >/sys/class/firmware/timeout
> +fi
> +
>  # Set the kernel search path.
>  echo -n "$FWPATH" >/sys/module/firmware_class/parameters/path
>
> @@ -41,7 +54,9 @@ if diff -q "$FW" /dev/test_firmware >/dev/null ; then
>         echo "$0: firmware was not expected to match" >&2
>         exit 1
>  else
> -       echo "$0: timeout works"
> +       if [ "$HAS_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER" = "yes" ]; then
> +               echo "$0: timeout works"
> +       fi
>  fi
>
>  # This should succeed via kernel load or will fail after 1 second after
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_userhelper.sh 
> b/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_userhelper.sh
> index 6efbade12139..b9983f8e09f6 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_userhelper.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_userhelper.sh
> @@ -9,7 +9,17 @@ modprobe test_firmware
>
>  DIR=/sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware
>
> -OLD_TIMEOUT=$(cat /sys/class/firmware/timeout)
> +# CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER has a sysfs class under /sys/class/firmware/
> +# These days no one enables CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER so check for that
> +# as an indicator for CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER.
> +HAS_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER=$(if [ -d /sys/class/firmware/ ]; then echo yes; 
> else echo no; fi)
> +
> +if [ "$HAS_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER" = "yes" ]; then
> +       OLD_TIMEOUT=$(cat /sys/class/firmware/timeout)
> +else
> +       echo "usermode helper disabled so ignoring test"
> +       exit 0
> +fi
>
>  FWPATH=$(mktemp -d)
>  FW="$FWPATH/test-firmware.bin"
> --
> 2.3.2.209.gd67f9d5.dirty
>

This looks fine. We really need a general case for "XFAIL" style
output on tests. Until then:

Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>

-Kees


-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to