From: Toshi Kani <toshi.k...@hp.com>
region_is_ram() looks up the iomem_resource table to check if
a target range is in RAM. However, it always returns with -1
due to invalid range checks. It always breaks the loop at the
first entry of the table.
Another issue is that it compares p->flags and flags, but it
always fails. The flags is declared as int, which makes it as
a negative value with IORESOURCE_BUSY (0x80000000) set while
p->flags is unsigned long.
Fix the range check and flags so that region_is_ram() works as
advertised.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.k...@hp.com>
Cc: Mike Travis <tra...@sgi.com>
Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcg...@suse.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
---
kernel/resource.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index 90552aab5f2d..fed052a1bc9f 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -504,13 +504,13 @@ int region_is_ram(resource_size_t start, unsigned long
size)
{
struct resource *p;
resource_size_t end = start + size - 1;
- int flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
+ unsigned long flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
const char *name = "System RAM";
int ret = -1;
read_lock(&resource_lock);
for (p = iomem_resource.child; p ; p = p->sibling) {
- if (end < p->start)
+ if (p->end < start)
continue;
if (p->start <= start && end <= p->end) {
@@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ int region_is_ram(resource_size_t start, unsigned long size)
ret = 1;
break;
}
- if (p->end < start)
+ if (end < p->start)
break; /* not found */
}
read_unlock(&resource_lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
