From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> The dev argument of cpufreq_add_policy_cpu() and cpufreq_add_dev_interface() is not used by any of them, so drop it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -999,8 +999,7 @@ static void cpufreq_remove_dev_symlink(s } } -static int cpufreq_add_dev_interface(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, - struct device *dev) +static int cpufreq_add_dev_interface(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { struct freq_attr **drv_attr; int ret = 0; @@ -1057,8 +1056,7 @@ static int cpufreq_init_policy(struct cp return cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy); } -static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, - unsigned int cpu, struct device *dev) +static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu) { int ret = 0; @@ -1225,7 +1223,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct device if (policy) { WARN_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus)); if (!policy_is_inactive(policy)) - return cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(policy, cpu, dev); + return cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(policy, cpu); /* This is the only online CPU for the policy. Start over. */ recover_policy = true; @@ -1328,7 +1326,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct device CPUFREQ_START, policy); if (!recover_policy) { - ret = cpufreq_add_dev_interface(policy, dev); + ret = cpufreq_add_dev_interface(policy); if (ret) goto out_exit_policy; blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
