On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:54 pm, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:05:06AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 08:42, Christopher Friesen wrote: > > > Lee Revell wrote: > > > > The controversy over the introduction of CONFIG_HZ demonstrated the > > > > urgency of getting a dynamic tick solution merged before 2.6.14. > > > > > > > > Anyone care to give a status report? Con, do you feel that the last > > > > version you posted is ready to go in? > > > > > > Last time I got interested in this, the management of the event queues > > > was still a fairly major performance hit. > > > > > > Has this overhead been brought down to reasonable levels? > > > > Srivatsa is still working on the smp-aware scalable version, so it's back > > in the development phase. > > Has there been an updated version of Thomas's C-state bus-mastering > measurement patch?
Same issue, it's waiting on dynticks before being reworked. Cheers, Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
