On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> So I think the kernel, by not enabling the ROM, is doing the
> right thing here.
Notice that on ppc even older versions didn't actually _enable_ the rom,
but they would write the non-enabled address to the PCI_ROM_ADDRESS
register, so that anybody who read that register would see _where_ the ROM
would be enabled if it was enabled.
That's the thing that changed in the commit Ben dislikes. Now, if the ROM
is disabled, we won't even write the disabled address to the PCI register,
because it led to trouble on some strange Matrox card. Probably a card
that nobody has ever used on PPC, and certainly not on a Powerbook, so in
that sense the apparent breakage on ppc is arguably "unnecessary" as far
as Ben is concerned.
But I notice the problem: pci_enable_rom() is indeed broken with the
change.
Ben, does this (totally untested) patch fix it for you?
Linus
----
diff --git a/drivers/pci/rom.c b/drivers/pci/rom.c
--- a/drivers/pci/rom.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/rom.c
@@ -23,11 +23,14 @@
*/
static void pci_enable_rom(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
- u32 rom_addr;
+ struct resource *res = pdev->resource + PCI_ROM_RESOURCE;
+ struct pci_bus_region region;
- pci_read_config_dword(pdev, pdev->rom_base_reg, &rom_addr);
- rom_addr |= PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE;
- pci_write_config_dword(pdev, pdev->rom_base_reg, rom_addr);
+ if (!res->flags)
+ return;
+
+ pcibios_resource_to_bus(pdev, ®ion, res);
+ pci_write_config_dword(pdev, pdev->rom_base_reg, region.start |
PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE);
}
/**
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
