On 07/28/2015 10:05 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 24.07.2015, 17:21 -0700 schrieb Moritz Fischer:
>> Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fisc...@ettus.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt | 13 +++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..ac4499e
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
>> +Xilinx Zynq PL Reset Manager
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible: "xlnx,zynq-reset-pl"
>> +- syscon <&slcr>;
>> +- #reset-cells: 1
>> +
>> +Example:
>> + rstc: rstc@240 {
>> + #reset-cells = <1>;
>> + compatible = "xlnx,zynq-reset-pl";
>> + syscon = <&slcr>;
>
> Why the syscon phandle if rstc always is the child of slcr? Why not just
> request the syscon for the rstc's parent node.
We are using this description for pincntrl which was properly reviewed
that's why I expect Moritz just use the same style.
But yes also referencing parent should work.
TBH I don't have strong preference but having unified style is something
what I would prefer.
Also I see that using parent is used by others and it looks like that
having something like syscon_regmap_lookup_parent will be worth to have.
Thanks,
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
