Hi,

the sunrpc stats are collected in unsigned integers, but they are
printed with '%d'.  That can result in negative numbers in
/proc/net/rpc when the highest bit of a counter is set.  The following
patch changes '%d' to '%u' where appropriate.

Max

--- linux-2.6.13/net/sunrpc/stats.c.orig        2005-08-30 10:22:35.000000000 
+0200
+++ linux-2.6.13/net/sunrpc/stats.c     2005-08-30 10:28:51.000000000 +0200
@@ -35,13 +35,13 @@
        int             i, j;
 
        seq_printf(seq,
-               "net %d %d %d %d\n",
+               "net %u %u %u %u\n",
                        statp->netcnt,
                        statp->netudpcnt,
                        statp->nettcpcnt,
                        statp->nettcpconn);
        seq_printf(seq,
-               "rpc %d %d %d\n",
+               "rpc %u %u %u\n",
                        statp->rpccnt,
                        statp->rpcretrans,
                        statp->rpcauthrefresh);
@@ -50,10 +50,10 @@
                const struct rpc_version *vers = prog->version[i];
                if (!vers)
                        continue;
-               seq_printf(seq, "proc%d %d",
+               seq_printf(seq, "proc%u %u",
                                        vers->number, vers->nrprocs);
                for (j = 0; j < vers->nrprocs; j++)
-                       seq_printf(seq, " %d",
+                       seq_printf(seq, " %u",
                                        vers->procs[j].p_count);
                seq_putc(seq, '\n');
        }
@@ -83,13 +83,13 @@
        int             i, j;
 
        seq_printf(seq,
-               "net %d %d %d %d\n",
+               "net %u %u %u %u\n",
                        statp->netcnt,
                        statp->netudpcnt,
                        statp->nettcpcnt,
                        statp->nettcpconn);
        seq_printf(seq,
-               "rpc %d %d %d %d %d\n",
+               "rpc %u %u %u %u %u\n",
                        statp->rpccnt,
                        statp->rpcbadfmt+statp->rpcbadauth+statp->rpcbadclnt,
                        statp->rpcbadfmt,
@@ -99,9 +99,9 @@
        for (i = 0; i < prog->pg_nvers; i++) {
                if (!(vers = prog->pg_vers[i]) || !(proc = vers->vs_proc))
                        continue;
-               seq_printf(seq, "proc%d %d", i, vers->vs_nproc);
+               seq_printf(seq, "proc%d %u", i, vers->vs_nproc);
                for (j = 0; j < vers->vs_nproc; j++, proc++)
-                       seq_printf(seq, " %d", proc->pc_count);
+                       seq_printf(seq, " %u", proc->pc_count);
                seq_putc(seq, '\n');
        }
 }

Reply via email to