Hello, On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 04:39:23PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > I would like to make cleaner kthread worker API and hide the definition > of struct kthread_worker. It will prevent any custom hacks and make > the API more secure. > > This patch provides an API to check if the worker has been created > and hides the implementation details.
Maybe it'd be a better idea to make create_kthread_worker() allocate and return pointer to struct kthread_worker? You're adding create/destroy interface anyway, it won't need a separate created query function and the synchronization rules would be self-evident. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
